Chirality as a Design Variable in Organic Solar Cells
A Morphological Physics treatment
Informal papers prepared for public release, including documents written for collaborators and partners.
A Morphological Physics treatment
An analytical research program for quantum-dot photovoltaics
Analytical approaches to photonic and transport optimization
Cross-theme connections
The mathematical spine of Morphological Physics. Titles listed for reference; papers not currently public.
The morphological construction and its consequences
How the eigenvalue spectrum of geometric space builds matter, encodes information, and interweaves gravity with quantum mechanics
A constructive solution
Agreement with the classical statistical energy distance
Modeling Rⁿ as a bounded space
The statistical-gravitational unification of the morphic field
Reference document
Papers applying the framework to open questions in mathematics and physics. These are internal documents, listed so the reader can see what the institute is thinking about that has not reached the experimental level; none is available here. They are quarantined on purpose. Most of the original ideas in this section are off, and the status lines below say how. The framework they were written in has since been corrected; the Monograph page's notes say where the current work stands, and nothing here has been rederived against it yet. Read these as a record of where the framework was tried and where it broke, not as results.
On the Navier–Stokes and Yang–Mills entries, the reason is worth stating once. This framework is a different kind of model from the ones those prizes are posed in, and the questions as posed do not arise in it.
Navier–Stokes. The states the problem asks about are nodes of the field, and the field is smooth through its nodes. This model never discards the variable that resolves the question, so the blowup the Clay problem asks after is not something it can produce. That is not a solution. It is a formulation in which the problem does not come up.
Yang–Mills. This model is not QCD, and the reader should be clear about that before anything else. The gap here is a constraint — the strong vacuum's quanta density is nonzero — rather than a theorem about the algebra the conjecture is posed over.
Neither is a proof of either conjecture, and we claim none. They are what this model has to say about the physics those questions were asked about, and they are reported as such.
A derivation from the underlying morphological principle
Withdrawn. The argument does not hold and is not being revised.
Full paper
Not a proof. The flux bound loses a normalisation and becomes critical; the ordering lemma is circular; the descent from S³ to ℝ³ fails. What survives is a small-data theorem with an explicit constant, and a reframing of the Clay question as a bound with a uniformity condition. A corrected note is in preparation. The papers stay up until it replaces them.
Technical summary
Companion to the paper above; the same status applies.
A morphological construction
Not a solution, and the title overclaims. In the current framework the gap is a constraint the model imposes, not a theorem of the algebra. The honest content is the model's own form of the question, one derived relation, and a ledger of what matches data only after an identification. Working notes dated October 2026 replace the paper's claims.
The redshift law and the primordial helium fraction
Under investigation. The coasting distance law against Pantheon+ stands as an empirical statement. The redshift mechanism and the helium fraction depend on identifications made in the earlier geometry that are not forced and have not been rederived in the current one.
A structural result for confinement dynamics
Under investigation. The structural result rests on one identity that stands independently of the fluid-flow papers; whether the rest does is being checked. The plasma experiment page has been taken down while the model is incomplete.
Papers extending the framework into specific applied domains. These rest on the morphological core, which came through the 2026 revision intact. The DNA program — the genetic alphabet, coupling anisotropy, the taxonomical cascade — is the clearest case: its geometry survives the revision as written. Its fine-detail claims are not yet confirmed, and that is the open work.
Boundary morphology and propulsion geometry
Part I: The derivation
A morphological reading of sequence-dependent mechanics
Classifying Life from Morphological Fragments
Papers exploring the framework's reach into questions of meaning.
The voice of geometric space
A morphological reading
What the framework predicts about the Gospel claims
How every major tradition optimizes the same physics